Assuming the positive testimonials are true--and there's no reason to believe otherwise--there are two possibilities here:
1) His firing was unjust and attributable to an incompetent or corrupt process. Either somebody was pursuing a personal vendetta or the evaluation process was so shoddy that it failed to properly take into account his many virtues as a teacher.
2) His firing was just and attributable to factors that have not been made public.
I don't know which is true. But then, neither does anyone else in the edublogosphere. None of us know because the necessary information is being withheld due to privacy provisions inherent to school personnel processes. These are provisions that I assume Casey, Jennings et al endorse. (If not, they should say so.) In this case, "by all accounts" means "according to one side of a two-sided dispute in which the other side is legally prohibited from making its case public." This is like rendering judgment in a trial after only hearing from the defense.
Eduwonkette bills itself as a blog that presents information seen "through the lens of social science." That's an obvious claim to the legitimacy that properly-conducted social science entails. But a crucial principle of social science is matching the strength of claims to the strength and breadth of evidence. And such principles really only matter when they collide with ideology or larger agendas. We may never know if Art Siebens was justly fired--that's the price of confidentiality in h.r. matters--but his case has at least provided some clarity about other things.
8 comments:
Hey, hey! You forgot to tar me with that criticism! Or do I not count because I'm an historian, and we're not REAL social scientists?
I didn't tar you because I didn't think you should be tarred. Was that not clear from "generally sober analysis" and noting that you made a point of including the minority parent objections?
Two things about the whole brouhaha:
1) White parents and minority parents have a history of clashing at Wilson about a variety of topics. The minority parent group (and I have no idea how many of Wilson's minority parents are in that group) wants to reinstate those teachers it felt were minority-friendly. They're picking and choosing which teachers should come back based solely on their judgement of that teacher's affinity for minority students, and make no claims about qualification or instructional effectiveness. Just because they provide another opinion doesn't mean they provide balance.
2) Dr. Seibens was fired as part of NCLB mandated restructuring. The restructuring plan is available here:
http://www.k12.dc.us/offices/oda/doc/plans_restructure/Wilson.pdf
I don't know what that tells us about the challenges of restructuring, but it's worth noting.
How ironic to see this moronic blog take the hard line on sound evidence.
"None of us know because the necessary information is being withheld due to privacy provisions inherent to school personnel processes."
Not really, Checking the ReinstateDrArt website you'll see that Dr Siebens gave permission to the City Council Chair to receive and review his entire personnel folder. Chariman Gray read through it personally. There was nothing untoward in it.
Kevin,
I suspect that judgment may be rooted partly in aesthetics than in the merits of the arguments. (Are you saying that you really prefer a Talcott Parsons writing style from a sociologist rather than someone who writes in a lively style that occasionally goes where you wouldn't?) I know how to play the cool dispassionate observer, and I suspect that comes across fairly well in my writing, but the central questions raised by Jennings are right.
I used to have a lot of respect for Eduwonkette. Unfortunately, she jumped to a conclusion about Art Siebens before trying to dig more deeply into the case. it would not have taken long to find out that Siebens has had a long history of racially inciteful behaviors and comments. Why do you think two principals did not want him? Thanks, Kevin, for at least raising the issue.
To "anonymous" of 10-14-08:
Where did you dig to find the information that you allude to and what specific information did you find? It's troubling if such info was not made available to the teacher himself and placed in his personnel folder.
It's also troubling that such an accusation would be made with no data to back it up.
Another Anonymous
Post a Comment