Two pieces of bad news today for those working to build a quality supply of public schools:
First, the 1st District Court of Appeals in Florida ruled that a 2006 law creating the Florida Schools of Excellence Commission conflicts with the Florida state constitution. According to the court, the Commission, which would be an independent, statewide office established to approve and support charter schools, was unconstitutional because the Florida constitution limits oversight of charter schools to local school districts.
Well, it looks like it's time to change the Florida constitution. A growing body of research shows that having, in addition to local school districts, one or more professional authorizers whose sole focus is approving and overseeing charter schools makes for a healthier and higher quality charter school sector. In fact, a 2006 ES report on Florida charter schools stated that the proposed Schools of Excellence Commission, "will likely reduce the number of appeals to the State Board and relieve unwilling sponsors of their chartering responsibilities while significantly improving the quality and transparency of authorizing across the state."
And the second piece of bad news is the bailout bill passed in the House Education Committee in Michigan which allowed Detroit to keep it's "first class school district" status (reducing the enrollment threshold from 100,000 students to 60,000 students) and thereby limiting the opening of new charter schools in the district. As we've reported, maintenance is required among Michigan's charter schools, but a blunt limit on opening new charter schools does nothing to improve the quality of charter schools or the quality of Detroit Public Schools.
Thursday, December 04, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Erin,
You're misreading the stories, or the reporters you're reading are. It is not that the Florida constitution limits oversight of charter schools; the court concluded that the Florida constitution defines county school boards as the constitutional bodies to oversee public schools. By exclusion, the FSEC has no authority making such decisions.
I suppose one could argue that the state constitution should be amended merely so that there could be a statewide authorizing body, but is there any evidence that most county boards are dramatically unfair to charter authorizers, and that the FSEC is a fabulous rather than a political "yeah, sure, you fog a mirror" authorizer?
Post a Comment